- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i73+ vs i76
CHCNAV i73+ vs CHCNAV i76
What i73+ does better (0) and where i76 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
i73+i76
| i73+ | i76 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 85 mm | 56 mm | +29 mm |
| Width | 119 mm | 106 mm | +13 mm |
| Weight | 730 g | 450 g | +280 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is i73+ better than i76?
i73+ has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is i76 better than i73+?
- Weight730 g vs 450 g+62%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Tracking channels624 vs 1,4082.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L5, E6, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 624 | 1,408 |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio | UHF radio |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | — |
| Power source | Removable rechargeable pack | — |
| External power input | — | Type-C 5 V / 2 A |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 730 g | 450 g |
| Width | 119 mm | 106 mm |
| Height | 85 mm | 56 mm |
| Depth | 119 mm | — |
