- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i76 vs M100X
CHCNAV i76 vs ComNav M100X
What i76 does better (2) and where M100X wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
i76M100X
| i76 | M100X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 56 mm | 151 mm | −95 mm |
| Width | 106 mm | 27 mm | +79 mm |
| Weight | 450 g | 300 g | +150 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is i76 better than M100X?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Drop resistance2 m vs 1 m2×
Why is M100X better than i76?
- Weight450 g vs 300 g+50%
- Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 75 °C+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L5, E6, B2 | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Max. tilt angle | 60° | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | UHF radio | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | — |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | Type-C 5 V / 2 A | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 450 g | 300 g |
| Width | 106 mm | 27 mm |
| Height | 56 mm | 151 mm |
| Depth | — | 103 mm |
| Housing material | — | Aluminum Alloy |
