- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i76 vs Archer 4
CHCNAV i76 vs Juniper Archer 4
What i76 does better (2) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
i76Archer 4
| i76 | Archer 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 56 mm | 102 mm | −46 mm |
| Width | 106 mm | 42 mm | +64 mm |
| Weight | 450 g | 42 g | +408 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is i76 better than Archer 4?
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 1847.7×
- Built-in UHF radioYes · Archer 4: No
Why is Archer 4 better than i76?
- Weight450 g vs 42 g10.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L5, E6, B2 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 184 |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Max. tilt angle | 60° | — |
| Correction sources | UHF radio | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | No |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | Type-C 5 V / 2 A | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | — |
| Weight | 450 g | 42 g |
| Width | 106 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 56 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | — | 34 mm |
| Housing material | — | N/A |
