- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i89 vs R580
CHCNAV i89 vs Trimble R580
What i89 does better (7) and where R580 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is i89 better than R580?
- Battery life16 h vs 5 h3.2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)8 mm vs 10 mm+25%
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 3364.2×
- Weight750 g vs 1,080 g+44%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -20 °C+-50%
- Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 55 °C+18%
Why is R580 better than i89?
R580 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 336 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | 15 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, SBAS | UHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 5 h |
| External power input | 5 V / 2 A | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| MIL-STD-810 | Yes | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 55 °C |
| Weight | 750 g | 1,080 g |
| Width | — | 140 mm |
| Height | — | 114 mm |
| Housing material | — | Plastic with metal endoskeleton |
