LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. i93 vs Mars Pro

CHCNAV i93 vs ComNav Mars Pro

What i93 does better (2) and where Mars Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

CHCNAV i93
CHCNAV · 2023i93
8.6Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
ComNav Mars Pro
ComNav · 2023Mars Pro
7.8Score
2 advantages
4.0Positioning8.5
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
9.8Battery9.0
3.4Durability3.6

Why is i93 better than Mars Pro?

  1. Battery life36 h vs 20 h+80%
  2. Weight1,150 g vs 1,200 g+4%

Why is Mars Pro better than i93?

  1. Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
  2. Tracking channels1,408 vs 1,668+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported56
Tracking channels1,4081,668
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)YesYes
RTK positioningYesYes
RTK accuracy (horizontal)—8 mm
Static accuracy (horizontal)—3 mm
Tilt compensation (IMU)Yes—
Correction sourcesNTRIP (internet), L-band / PPP, SBASNTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS
Built-in UHF radio—Yes
L-band / PPP correctionsYesYes
Raw data logging (RINEX)—Yes
Maps & navigation
Internal storage—8 GB
Connectivity & safety
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYesYes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)—Yes
CameraYes—
Battery & power
Battery life36 h20 h
External power input9 V DC to 28 V DC7-28VDC
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP67
Water protection (IPx)—IPx7
MIL-STD-810Yes—
Drop resistance—2 m
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C-40 °C
Operating temperature (max)65 °C65 °C
Weight1,150 g1,200 g
Width—150 mm
Height—70 mm
Housing material—magnesium aluminum alloy
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare