- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i93 vs Marvel
CHCNAV i93 vs INTEC Marvel
What i93 does better (2) and where Marvel wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is i93 better than Marvel?
- Battery life36 h vs 20 h+80%
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 4+25%
Why is Marvel better than i93?
- Weight1,150 g vs 660 g+74%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 4 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), SBAS |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 36 h | 20 h |
| External power input | 9 V DC to 28 V DC | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | Yes | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | — |
| Weight | 1,150 g | 660 g |
| Housing material | — | ABS |
