- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- P2 vs iRTK5
CHCNAV P2 vs Hi-Target iRTK5
What P2 does better (2) and where iRTK5 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is P2 better than iRTK5?
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 4+50%
- Weight1,000 g vs 1,200 g+20%
Why is iRTK5 better than P2?
iRTK5 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 4 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3, L-band | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 336 | 336 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 9 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 6,800 mAh |
| External power input | 9V-36V | 6-28V DC external power input（5-pin port） with over-discharge protection |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | Yes | — |
| Drop resistance | 1.2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 1,000 g | 1,200 g |
| Width | — | 158 mm |
| Height | — | 98 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum alloy | Magnesium Alloy |
