- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Mars Laser RTK vs Trion V10i
ComNav Mars Laser RTK vs FJD Trion V10i
What Mars Laser RTK does better (2) and where Trion V10i wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Positioning9.2
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
8.7Battery6.8
2.6Durability2.7
Why is Mars Laser RTK better than Trion V10i?
- Battery life20 h vs 15 h+33%
- Tracking channels1,590 vs 1,408+13%
Why is Trion V10i better than Mars Laser RTK?
- Weight1,200 g vs 1,000 g+20%
- Operating temperature (min)-20 °C vs -30 °C+-33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 60° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | UHF radio |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 15 h |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | — |
| External power input | 7-28VDC | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | 1,200 g | 1,000 g |
| Width | 150 mm | — |
| Height | 70 mm | — |
| Housing material | magnesium aluminum alloy | Aluminum Magnesium Alloy |
