- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Mars Laser RTK vs Reach RS3
ComNav Mars Laser RTK vs Emlid Reach RS3
What Mars Laser RTK does better (1) and where Reach RS3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Positioning4.5
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
Why is Mars Laser RTK better than Reach RS3?
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
Why is Reach RS3 better than Mars Laser RTK?
Reach RS3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2 |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, Cellular modem |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 6,800 mAh | — |
| External power input | 7-28VDC | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | — |
| Weight | 1,200 g | — |
| Width | 150 mm | — |
| Height | 70 mm | — |
| Housing material | magnesium aluminum alloy | — |
