- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- N2 vs SC600+
ComNav N2 vs Stonex SC600+
What N2 does better (1) and where SC600+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
N2SC600+
| N2 | SC600+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 48 mm | 34 mm | +14 mm |
| Width | 149 mm | 150 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 670 g | 550 g | +120 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is N2 better than SC600+?
- Tracking channels1,590 vs 1,408+13%
Why is SC600+ better than N2?
- Weight670 g vs 550 g+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | — |
| External power input | 5/9V | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 670 g | 550 g |
| Width | 149 mm | 150 mm |
| Height | 48 mm | 34 mm |
| Depth | — | 105 mm |
| Housing material | magnesium aluminum alloy | — |
