- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- N2 vs BX992
ComNav N2 vs Trimble BX992
What N2 does better (1) and where BX992 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
N2BX992
| N2 | BX992 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 48 mm | 43 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 149 mm | 93 mm | +56 mm |
| Weight | 670 g | 750 g | −80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is N2 better than BX992?
- Weight670 g vs 750 g+12%
Why is BX992 better than N2?
- Operating temperature (min)-30 °C vs -40 °C+-25%
- Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 70 °C+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Frequency bands | — | L-band |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | — |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 3 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | L-band / PPP |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | — |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | — |
| External power input | 5/9V | 26-pin D-sub connector |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 70 °C |
| Weight | 670 g | 750 g |
| Width | 149 mm | 93 mm |
| Height | 48 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | — | 185 mm |
| Housing material | magnesium aluminum alloy | — |
