- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Venus Laser RTK vs Marvel Lite
ComNav Venus Laser RTK vs INTEC Marvel Lite
What Venus Laser RTK does better (3) and where Marvel Lite wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Positioning3.1
9.0Battery9.0
5.5Durability8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Venus Laser RTKMarvel Lite
| Venus Laser RTK | Marvel Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 mm | 89 mm | +61 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 120 mm | −50 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 89 mm | −9 mm |
| Weight | 380 g | 660 g | −280 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Venus Laser RTK better than Marvel Lite?
- Weight380 g vs 660 g+74%
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 4+50%
- Tracking channels1,590 vs 1,408+13%
Why is Marvel Lite better than Venus Laser RTK?
- Operating temperature (min)-20 °C vs -45 °C+-56%
- Operating temperature (max)60 °C vs 75 °C+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 4 |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | SBAS | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 20 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | -45 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 380 g | 660 g |
| Width | 70 mm | 120 mm |
| Height | 150 mm | 89 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 89 mm |
| Housing material | macromolecule nanomaterial | ABS |
