- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Marvel Lite vs Archer 4
INTEC Marvel Lite vs Juniper Archer 4
What Marvel Lite does better (2) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Marvel LiteArcher 4
| Marvel Lite | Archer 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 89 mm | 102 mm | −13 mm |
| Width | 120 mm | 42 mm | +78 mm |
| Depth | 89 mm | 34 mm | +55 mm |
| Weight | 660 g | 42 g | +618 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Marvel Lite better than Archer 4?
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 1847.7×
- Built-in UHF radioYes · Archer 4: No
Why is Archer 4 better than Marvel Lite?
- Weight660 g vs 42 g15.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 184 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -45 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | — |
| Weight | 660 g | 42 g |
| Width | 120 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 89 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 89 mm | 34 mm |
| Housing material | ABS | N/A |
