LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. Venus Laser RTK vs Eyr

ComNav Venus Laser RTK vs SatLab Eyr

What Venus Laser RTK does better (3) and where Eyr wins (3) — every spec side by side.

ComNav Venus Laser RTK
ComNav · 2022Venus Laser RTK
9.1Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
SatLab Eyr
SatLab · 2022Eyr
7.9Score
3 advantages
9.4Positioning8.9
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
9.0Battery6.8
5.5Durability8.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Venus Laser RTKEyr
70 × 15080138 × 79
Venus Laser RTKEyrDifference
Height150 mm79 mm+71 mm
Width70 mm138 mm−68 mm
Weight380 g980 g−600 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Venus Laser RTK better than Eyr?

  1. Weight380 g vs 980 g2.6×
  2. Battery life20 h vs 15 h+33%
  3. Tracking channels1,590 vs 1,408+13%

Why is Eyr better than Venus Laser RTK?

  1. Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
  2. Operating temperature (min)-20 °C vs -40 °C+-50%
  3. Operating temperature (max)60 °C vs 75 °C+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported66
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)—Yes
Frequency bands—L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3
Tracking channels1,5901,408
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)YesYes
RTK positioningYesYes
RTK accuracy (horizontal)8 mm8 mm
Static accuracy (horizontal)—2.5 mm
Correction sourcesSBASNTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS
Built-in UHF radio—Yes
Raw data logging (RINEX)—Yes
Maps & navigation
Internal storage—8 GB
Connectivity & safety
BluetoothYesYes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)—Yes
USB-CYes—
Camera—Yes
Battery & power
Battery life20 h15 h
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx8
Drop resistance2 m—
Operating temperature (min)-20 °C-40 °C
Operating temperature (max)60 °C75 °C
Weight380 g980 g
Width70 mm138 mm
Height150 mm79 mm
Depth80 mm—
Housing materialmacromolecule nanomaterialMagnesium
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare