- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Venus Laser RTK vs HiPer CR
ComNav Venus Laser RTK vs Topcon HiPer CR
What Venus Laser RTK does better (4) and where HiPer CR wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Positioning2.1
9.0Battery3.0
5.5Durability4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Venus Laser RTKHiPer CR
| Venus Laser RTK | HiPer CR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 mm | 200 mm | −50 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 50 mm | +20 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 50 mm | +30 mm |
| Weight | 380 g | 440 g | −60 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Venus Laser RTK better than HiPer CR?
- Battery life20 h vs 10 h2×
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)8 mm vs 10 mm+25%
- Tracking channels1,590 vs 2267×
- Weight380 g vs 440 g+16%
Why is HiPer CR better than Venus Laser RTK?
HiPer CR has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,590 | 226 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 3 mm |
| Correction sources | SBAS | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 10 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 60 °C |
| Weight | 380 g | 440 g |
| Width | 70 mm | 50 mm |
| Height | 150 mm | 200 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 50 mm |
| Housing material | macromolecule nanomaterial | Magnesium |
