- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Reach RX2 vs Arrow 100+
Emlid Reach RX2 vs Eos Arrow 100+
What Reach RX2 does better (1) and where Arrow 100+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Battery8.4
Why is Reach RX2 better than Arrow 100+?
- Weight280 g vs 372 g+33%
Why is Arrow 100+ better than Reach RX2?
- Battery life16 h vs 18 h+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | — |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | — |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E6, B1, B2, B3 | — |
| Tracking channels | — | 158 |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 7 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet) | L-band / PPP |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 18 h |
| Power source | — | Removable rechargeable pack |
| External power input | — | 12VDC Power Supply |
| Build & durability | ||
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 70 °C |
| Weight | 280 g | 372 g |
| Width | — | 42 mm |
| Height | — | 125 mm |
| Depth | — | 84 mm |
| Housing material | — | Xenoy |
