- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs Reach RX2
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Emlid Reach RX2
What CGI-230 does better (0) and where Reach RX2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is CGI-230 better than Reach RX2?
CGI-230 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Reach RX2 better than CGI-230?
- Weight400 g vs 280 g+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 7 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet) |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 16 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | — |
| Weight | 400 g | 280 g |
| Width | 105 mm | — |
| Height | 350 mm | — |
| Depth | 154 mm | — |
