- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Reach RX2 vs eTrex Touch
Emlid Reach RX2 vs Garmin eTrex Touch
What Reach RX2 does better (0) and where eTrex Touch wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Positioning9.5
7.8Battery8.0
Why is Reach RX2 better than eTrex Touch?
Reach RX2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is eTrex Touch better than Reach RX2?
- Battery life16 h vs 130 h8.1×
- Weight280 g vs 150 g+87%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E6, B1, B2, B3 | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 7 mm | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet) | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 3″ |
| Resolution | — | 240 × 400 |
| Horizontal resolution | — | 240 px |
| Vertical resolution | — | 400 px |
| Pixel density | — | 155 ppi |
| Display type | — | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | — | Yes |
| Map types | — | Road, Topographic, Satellite imagery |
| Turn-by-turn routing | — | Yes |
| Satellite imagery | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 32 GB |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 130 h |
| Power source | — | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Weight | 280 g | 150 g |
| Width | — | 66 mm |
| Height | — | 105 mm |
| Depth | — | 25 mm |
