- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Reach RX2 vs Magic L
Emlid Reach RX2 vs INTEC Magic L
What Reach RX2 does better (3) and where Magic L wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Reach RX2 better than Magic L?
- Weight280 g vs 850 g3×
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)7 mm vs 8 mm+14%
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
Why is Magic L better than Reach RX2?
- Battery life16 h vs 18 h+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 120° |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet) | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 18 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Weight | 280 g | 850 g |
| Width | — | 132 mm |
| Height | — | 109 mm |
| Depth | — | 132 mm |
| Housing material | — | ABS |
