- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Reach RX2 vs SV200 INS
Emlid Reach RX2 vs SingularXYZ SV200 INS
What Reach RX2 does better (1) and where SV200 INS wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Reach RX2 better than SV200 INS?
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)7 mm vs 8 mm+14%
Why is SV200 INS better than Reach RX2?
- Weight280 g vs 203 g+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet) | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 85 °C |
| Weight | 280 g | 203 g |
| Width | — | 70 mm |
| Height | — | 29 mm |
| Depth | — | 110 mm |
| Housing material | — | Aluminum alloy |
