- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Drive 52 vs E505 MAGNETIC
Garmin Drive 52 vs Navitel E505 MAGNETIC
What Drive 52 does better (1) and where E505 MAGNETIC wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Display3.9
9.2Durability8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Drive 52E505 MAGNETIC
| Drive 52 | E505 MAGNETIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 84 mm | 85 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 140 mm | 138 mm | +2 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 17 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 177 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Drive 52 better than E505 MAGNETIC?
- Weight171 g vs 177 g+4%
Why is E505 MAGNETIC better than Drive 52?
- Pixel density110 ppi vs 187 ppi+70%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5″ | 5″ |
| Resolution | 480 × 272 | 800 × 480 |
| Horizontal resolution | 480 px | 800 px |
| Vertical resolution | 272 px | 480 px |
| Pixel density | 110 ppi | 187 ppi |
| Display type | Colour TFT LCD | Colour TFT LCD |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | — | Yes |
| Map coverage | — | Europe |
| Map types | — | Road |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | Yes |
| Free map updates | Yes | Yes |
| Driver alerts (speed limits, curves) | Yes | — |
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 1 h | — |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 177 g |
| Width | 140 mm | 138 mm |
| Height | 84 mm | 85 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 17 mm |
