- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- GPSMAP 64sx vs Rino 700
Garmin GPSMAP 64sx vs Garmin Rino 700
What GPSMAP 64sx does better (6) and where Rino 700 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Positioning3.1
2.9Display2.1
5.0Maps & navigation2.2
7.7Durability6.4
Why is GPSMAP 64sx better than Rino 700?
- Preloaded mapsYes · Rino 700: No
- Screen size2.6″ vs 2.2″+18%
- Satellite systems supported3 vs 2+50%
- Memory card slotYes · Rino 700: No
- Weight230 g vs 268 g+17%
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 93 ppi+19%
Why is Rino 700 better than GPSMAP 64sx?
Rino 700 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS |
| Satellite systems supported | 3 | 2 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.6″ | 2.2″ |
| Resolution | 160 × 240 | 128 × 160 |
| Horizontal resolution | 160 px | 128 px |
| Vertical resolution | 240 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 93 ppi |
| Display type | — | Monochrome LCD |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | No |
| Turn-by-turn routing | Yes | — |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Waypoints | 5,000 | 1,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| ANT+ | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 13 h |
| Power source | AA batteries | Built-in rechargeable |
| Runs on AA batteries | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 230 g | 268 g |
| Width | — | 60 mm |
| Height | — | 178 mm |
| Depth | — | 44 mm |
