- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- inReach Mini 3 Plus vs zūmo XT3
Garmin inReach Mini 3 Plus vs Garmin zūmo XT3
What inReach Mini 3 Plus does better (4) and where zūmo XT3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display4.5
5.9Maps & navigation7.8
4.4Connectivity & safety5.9
7.6Battery8.8
3.5Durability9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
inReach Mini 3 Pluszūmo XT3
| inReach Mini 3 Plus | zūmo XT3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 98 mm | 75 mm | +23 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 128 mm | −73 mm |
| Depth | 27 mm | 24 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 125 g | 190 g | −65 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is inReach Mini 3 Plus better than zūmo XT3?
- Battery life350 h vs 7 h50×
- Satellite systems supported4 vs 22×
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)Yes · zūmo XT3: No
- Weight125 g vs 190 g+52%
Why is zūmo XT3 better than inReach Mini 3 Plus?
- Screen size1.9″ vs 4.7″2.5×
- Preloaded mapsNo · inReach Mini 3 Plus: Yes
- Pixel density201 ppi vs 315 ppi+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, Galileo |
| Satellite systems supported | 4 | 2 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.9″ | 4.7″ |
| Resolution | 306 × 230 | 1280 × 720 |
| Horizontal resolution | 306 px | 1,280 px |
| Vertical resolution | 230 px | 720 px |
| Pixel density | 201 ppi | 315 ppi |
| Display type | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) | Colour TFT LCD |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Glove-friendly touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | No | Yes |
| Map coverage | Worldwide | North America |
| Map types | — | Road, Topographic, Satellite imagery |
| Turn-by-turn routing | — | Yes |
| Free map updates | — | Yes |
| Live traffic | — | Yes |
| Speed camera alerts | — | Yes |
| Driver alerts (speed limits, curves) | — | Yes |
| Lane assist / junction view | — | Yes |
| Voice control | Yes | — |
| Satellite imagery | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Electronic compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Two-way satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| SOS / emergency alert | Yes | — |
| Satellite network | Iridium | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| ANT+ | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smartphone notifications | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 350 h | 7 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Built-in rechargeable |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | Yes | — |
| Weight | 125 g | 190 g |
| Width | 55 mm | 128 mm |
| Height | 98 mm | 75 mm |
| Depth | 27 mm | 24 mm |
Related comparisons
vs
Garmin inReach Mini 3vsGarmin inReach Mini 3 Plus
4.75.4
vs
Garmin inReach Mini 3 PlusvsGarmin inReach Messenger Plus
5.46.2
vs
Garmin inReach Mini 3 PlusvsGarmin inReach Messenger
5.47.8
vs
Garmin zūmo XT3vsGarmin Tread 2
8.78.4
vs
Garmin zūmo XT3vsGarmin Tread 2 SxS Edition
8.76.6
vs
Garmin zūmo XT3vsGarmin Tread XL Overland Edition
8.75.0