- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- vRTK vs Eyr
Hi-Target vRTK vs SatLab Eyr
What vRTK does better (0) and where Eyr wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
vRTKEyr
| vRTK | Eyr | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 79 mm | 79 mm | = |
| Width | 138 mm | 138 mm | = |
| Weight | 980 g | 980 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is vRTK better than Eyr?
vRTK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Eyr better than vRTK?
Eyr has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | 2.5 mm |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 15 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 980 g | 980 g |
| Width | 138 mm | 138 mm |
| Height | 79 mm | 79 mm |
| Housing material | Magnesium | Magnesium |
