- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- vRTK vs SC600+
Hi-Target vRTK vs Stonex SC600+
What vRTK does better (3) and where SC600+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
vRTKSC600+
| vRTK | SC600+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 79 mm | 34 mm | +45 mm |
| Width | 138 mm | 150 mm | −12 mm |
| Weight | 980 g | 550 g | +430 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is vRTK better than SC600+?
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -30 °C+-25%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 65 °C+15%
Why is SC600+ better than vRTK?
- Weight980 g vs 550 g+78%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | — |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 980 g | 550 g |
| Width | 138 mm | 150 mm |
| Height | 79 mm | 34 mm |
| Depth | — | 105 mm |
| Housing material | Magnesium | — |
