- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs Marvel Lite
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs INTEC Marvel Lite
What CGI-230 does better (1) and where Marvel Lite wins (1) — every spec side by side.
9.5Durability8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
CGI-230Marvel Lite
| CGI-230 | Marvel Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 350 mm | 89 mm | +261 mm |
| Width | 105 mm | 120 mm | −15 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 89 mm | +65 mm |
| Weight | 400 g | 660 g | −260 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CGI-230 better than Marvel Lite?
- Weight400 g vs 660 g+65%
Why is Marvel Lite better than CGI-230?
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -45 °C+-11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 4 |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | — | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 20 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -45 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 400 g | 660 g |
| Width | 105 mm | 120 mm |
| Height | 350 mm | 89 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 89 mm |
| Housing material | — | ABS |
