LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. Archer 4 vs S999

Juniper Archer 4 vs Stonex S999

What Archer 4 does better (1) and where S999 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Juniper Archer 4
Juniper · 2024Archer 4
1 advantage
vs
Stonex S999
Stonex · 2024S999
8.5Score
2 advantages
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

Archer 4S999
42 × 10234139 × 74139
Archer 4S999Difference
Height102 mm74 mm+28 mm
Width42 mm139 mm−97 mm
Depth34 mm139 mm−105 mm
Weight42 g1,065 g−1,023 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Archer 4 better than S999?

  1. Weight42 g vs 1,065 g25.4×

Why is S999 better than Archer 4?

  1. Tracking channels184 vs 1,4087.7×
  2. L-band / PPP correctionsNo · Archer 4: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systems—GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported—6
Tracking channels1841,408
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)—Yes
RTK positioningYes—
Tilt compensation (IMU)—Yes
Max. tilt angle—60°
Correction sourcesNTRIP (internet)NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS
Built-in UHF radioNoNo
L-band / PPP correctionsNoYes
Maps & navigation
Internal storage—31 GB
Connectivity & safety
Bluetooth—Yes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Camera—Yes
Battery & power
Battery life—10 h
Battery capacity—13,600 mAh
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Operating temperature (min)—-40 °C
Operating temperature (max)—65 °C
Weight42 g1,065 g
Width42 mm139 mm
Height102 mm74 mm
Depth34 mm139 mm
Housing materialN/A—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare