- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Njord vs R780
SatLab Njord vs Trimble R780
What Njord does better (2) and where R780 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Njord better than R780?
- Weight1,200 g vs 1,550 g+29%
- Tracking channels1,408 vs 6722.1×
Why is R780 better than Njord?
- Battery life3 h vs 6 h2.2×
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
- Internal storage8 GB vs 9 GB+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, B1, B2, B3, L-band | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 672 |
| GNSS engine | — | Trimble Maxwell 7 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 3 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | 9 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 3 h | 6 h |
| Battery capacity | 2,500 mAh | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 1,200 g | 1,550 g |
| Width | — | 139 mm |
| Height | — | 130 mm |
| Housing material | — | Marine Aluminium |
