- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- SL8 vs S200
SatLab SL8 vs SingularXYZ S200
What SL8 does better (3) and where S200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL8S200
| SL8 | S200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 72 mm | 70 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 131 mm | 181 mm | −50 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL8 better than S200?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Built-in UHF radioYes · S200: No
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
Why is S200 better than SL8?
- Operating temperature (min)-20 °C vs -45 °C+-56%
- Operating temperature (max)50 °C vs 75 °C+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | — |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | 2.5 mm | — |
| Position update rate | — | 100 Hz |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Max. tilt angle | 60° | — |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | No |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 2 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -20 °C | -45 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 50 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 730 g | — |
| Width | 131 mm | 181 mm |
| Height | 72 mm | 70 mm |
| Depth | — | 181 mm |
