Alternatives to Garmin eTrex 32x
10 handheld GPS devices at a similar price that compete with the eTrex 32x — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the eTrex 32x
17% pricier ≈ $350
- Satellite systems supported 4 vs 2
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)
- Screen size 2.6″ vs 2.2″
- Battery life 16 h vs 25 h
- Weight 217 g vs 142 g
33% pricier ≈ $400
- Satellite systems supported 4 vs 2
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)
- Screen size 2.6″ vs 2.2″
- Battery life 16 h vs 25 h
- Weight 217 g vs 142 g
10% pricier ≈ $330
- Satellite systems supported 5 vs 2
- Screen size 3″ vs 2.2″
- Battery life 19 h vs 25 h
- Pixel density 155 ppi vs 182 ppi
6% pricier ≈ $320
- Screen size 3.2″ vs 2.2″
- Internal storage 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Pixel density 292 ppi vs 182 ppi
- Battery life 20 h vs 25 h
- Weight 172 g vs 142 g
16% pricier ≈ $350
- Screen size 3.7″ vs 2.2″
- Internal storage 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Battery life 19 h vs 25 h
- Weight 198 g vs 142 g
33% pricier ≈ $400
- Battery life 35 h vs 25 h
- Screen size 3″ vs 2.2″
- Satellite systems supported 3 vs 2
- Preloaded maps
- Weight 272 g vs 142 g
50% pricier ≈ $450
- Battery life 35 h vs 25 h
- Screen size 3″ vs 2.2″
- Satellite systems supported 3 vs 2
- Weight 272 g vs 142 g
- Pixel density 155 ppi vs 182 ppi
17% cheaper ≈ $250
- Battery life 100 h vs 25 h
- Satellite systems supported 3 vs 2
17% cheaper ≈ $250
- Battery life 200 h vs 25 h
- Satellite systems supported 6 vs 2
- Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)
- Preloaded maps
- Internal storage 0.03 GB vs 8 GB