LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon X vs eRTK10 Pro

Alpha GEO Falcon X vs eSurvey eRTK10 Pro

What Falcon X does better (1) and where eRTK10 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Alpha GEO Falcon X
Alpha GEO · 2026Falcon X
3.8Score
1 advantage
vs
eSurvey eRTK10 Pro
eSurvey · 2026eRTK10 Pro
6.2Score
4 advantages
Higher score
6.0Positioning5.6
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
2.0Battery3.8
2.3Durability9.1

Why is Falcon X better than eRTK10 Pro?

  1. Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)Yes · eRTK10 Pro: No

Why is eRTK10 Pro better than Falcon X?

  1. Battery life3 h vs 10 h3.3×
  2. Weight1,800 g vs 475 g3.8×
  3. Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
  4. Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systemsGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported56
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)YesNo
Frequency bandsL1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3L-band
Tracking channels1,4081,408
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)—Yes
RTK positioningYesYes
RTK accuracy (horizontal)8 mm8 mm
RTK accuracy (vertical)15 mm15 mm
Static accuracy (horizontal)—2.5 mm
Tilt compensation (IMU)—Yes
Max. tilt angle—60°
Correction sourcesNTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modemUHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS
Built-in UHF radioYesYes
L-band / PPP corrections—Yes
Raw data logging (RINEX)—Yes
Maps & navigation
Internal storage—8 GB
Connectivity & safety
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYesYes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
CameraYesYes
Battery & power
Battery life3 h10 h
Battery capacity—5,800 mAh
Power source—Built-in rechargeable
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP67IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx8
Drop resistance—2 m
Operating temperature (min)—-30 °C
Operating temperature (max)—70 °C
Weight1,800 g475 g
Width—115 mm
Height301 mm56 mm
Depth138 mm115 mm
Housing material—Magnalium
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare