- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Flex Mini vs M10 Mini
Bad Elf Flex Mini vs ComNav M10 Mini
What Flex Mini does better (2) and where M10 Mini wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Flex MiniM10 Mini
| Flex Mini | M10 Mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 90 mm | 130 mm | −40 mm |
| Width | 45 mm | 64 mm | −19 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 26 mm | +6 mm |
| Weight | 143 g | 175 g | −32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flex Mini better than M10 Mini?
- Battery life24 h vs 6 h4×
- Weight143 g vs 175 g+22%
Why is M10 Mini better than Flex Mini?
- RTK accuracy (horizontal)10 mm vs 8 mm+25%
- Tracking channels135 vs 9567.1×
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | Yes |
| Frequency bands | L1, L5, E1, E5a, B1, B2 | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 135 | 956 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 24 h | 6 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 2,600 mAh |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | — | -20 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | — | 60 °C |
| Weight | 143 g | 175 g |
| Width | 45 mm | 64 mm |
| Height | 90 mm | 130 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 26 mm |
| Housing material | Polycarbonate | Aluminum-magnesium alloy |
