- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Flex vs V200
Bad Elf Flex vs Hi-Target V200
What Flex does better (0) and where V200 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
FlexV200
| Flex | V200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254 mm | 67 mm | +187 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 132 mm | −62 mm |
| Weight | 854 g | 800 g | +54 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flex better than V200?
Flex has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is V200 better than Flex?
- Battery life11 h vs 12 h+9%
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 6+20%
- Weight854 g vs 800 g+7%
- Operating temperature (max)60 °C vs 70 °C+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | 800 | 800 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | UHF radio, L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 12 h |
| External power input | 12 A/h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 70 °C |
| Weight | 854 g | 800 g |
| Width | 70 mm | 132 mm |
| Height | 254 mm | 67 mm |
| Depth | 70 mm | — |
| Housing material | Aluminum | magnesium |
