- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Flex vs CGI-610
Bad Elf Flex vs CHCNAV CGI-610
What Flex does better (3) and where CGI-610 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
FlexCGI-610
| Flex | CGI-610 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254 mm | 50 mm | +204 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 120 mm | −50 mm |
| Depth | 70 mm | 160 mm | −90 mm |
| Weight | 854 g | 1,150 g | −296 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flex better than CGI-610?
- Weight854 g vs 1,150 g+35%
- L-band / PPP correctionsYes · CGI-610: No
- Tracking channels800 vs 555+44%
Why is CGI-610 better than Flex?
- Operating temperature (min)-30 °C vs -40 °C+-25%
- Operating temperature (max)60 °C vs 75 °C+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 5 |
| Tracking channels | 800 | 555 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| Position update rate | — | 100 Hz |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | — | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | — | Yes |
| Correction sources | L-band / PPP, SBAS | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | Yes | No |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | — |
| External power input | 12 A/h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | -30 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 60 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 854 g | 1,150 g |
| Width | 70 mm | 120 mm |
| Height | 254 mm | 50 mm |
| Depth | 70 mm | 160 mm |
| Housing material | Aluminum | Aluminium |
