- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Phantom 3 Slope vs Approach G20 Solar
Bushnell Phantom 3 Slope vs Garmin Approach G20 Solar
What Phantom 3 Slope does better (2) and where Approach G20 Solar wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display7.5
5.0Maps & navigation8.1
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
5.2Battery9.2
3.7Durability8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phantom 3 SlopeApproach G20 Solar
| Phantom 3 Slope | Approach G20 Solar | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 76 mm | 90 mm | −14 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 53 mm | +7 mm |
| Depth | 18 mm | 18 mm | = |
| Weight | 78 g | 108 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom 3 Slope better than Approach G20 Solar?
- Weight78 g vs 108 g+38%
- Screen size2.2″ vs 2.1″+5%
Why is Approach G20 Solar better than Phantom 3 Slope?
- Battery life18 h vs 180 h10×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
- Preloaded golf courses38,000 vs 43,000+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 1 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 2.1″ |
| Resolution | — | 240 × 320 |
| Horizontal resolution | — | 240 px |
| Vertical resolution | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 190 ppi |
| Display type | — | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | Yes |
| Map coverage | — | Worldwide |
| Map types | Golf courses | Golf courses |
| Preloaded golf courses | 38,000 | 43,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 180 h |
| Power source | — | Built-in rechargeable |
| Solar charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX6 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 78 g | 108 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 53 mm |
| Height | 76 mm | 90 mm |
| Depth | 18 mm | 18 mm |
