- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Approach G20 Solar vs Approach G82
Garmin Approach G20 Solar vs Garmin Approach G82
What Approach G20 Solar does better (2) and where Approach G82 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display9.0
8.1Maps & navigation8.1
5.9Connectivity & safety5.9
9.2Battery6.6
8.1Durability4.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Approach G20 SolarApproach G82
| Approach G20 Solar | Approach G82 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 90 mm | 160 mm | −70 mm |
| Width | 53 mm | 84 mm | −31 mm |
| Depth | 18 mm | 22 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 108 g | 308 g | −200 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Approach G20 Solar better than Approach G82?
- Battery life180 h vs 25 h7.2×
- Weight108 g vs 308 g2.9×
Why is Approach G82 better than Approach G20 Solar?
- Screen size2.1″ vs 5″2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 1 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.1″ | 5″ |
| Resolution | 240 × 320 | 480 × 800 |
| Horizontal resolution | 240 px | 480 px |
| Vertical resolution | 320 px | 800 px |
| Pixel density | 190 ppi | 187 ppi |
| Display type | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | Yes |
| Map coverage | Worldwide | Worldwide |
| Map types | Golf courses | Golf courses |
| Preloaded golf courses | 43,000 | 43,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 180 h | 25 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Built-in rechargeable |
| Solar charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 108 g | 308 g |
| Width | 53 mm | 84 mm |
| Height | 90 mm | 160 mm |
| Depth | 18 mm | 22 mm |
