- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- Approach G20 Solar vs Approach Z82
Garmin Approach G20 Solar vs Garmin Approach Z82
What Approach G20 Solar does better (2) and where Approach Z82 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Maps & navigation8.1
9.2Battery4.0
8.1Durability5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Approach G20 SolarApproach Z82
| Approach G20 Solar | Approach Z82 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 90 mm | 80 mm | +10 mm |
| Width | 53 mm | 123 mm | −70 mm |
| Depth | 18 mm | 42 mm | −24 mm |
| Weight | 108 g | 232 g | −124 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Approach G20 Solar better than Approach Z82?
- Battery life180 h vs 15 h12×
- Weight108 g vs 232 g2.1×
Why is Approach Z82 better than Approach G20 Solar?
Approach Z82 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Satellite systems supported | 1 | 1 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | No | No |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.1″ | — |
| Resolution | 240 × 320 | — |
| Horizontal resolution | 240 px | — |
| Vertical resolution | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 190 ppi | — |
| Display type | Transflective colour (sunlight-readable) | OLED / AMOLED |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Preloaded maps | Yes | Yes |
| Map coverage | Worldwide | Worldwide |
| Map types | Golf courses | Golf courses |
| Preloaded golf courses | 43,000 | 43,000 |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 180 h | 15 h |
| Power source | Built-in rechargeable | Built-in rechargeable |
| Solar charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Weight | 108 g | 232 g |
| Width | 53 mm | 123 mm |
| Height | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Depth | 18 mm | 42 mm |
