- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- X1-6 vs M300 Mini
Bynav X1-6 vs ComNav M300 Mini
What X1-6 does better (3) and where M300 Mini wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X1-6M300 Mini
| X1-6 | M300 Mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 116 mm | 52 mm | +64 mm |
| Width | 114 mm | 142 mm | −28 mm |
| Depth | 39 mm | 191 mm | −152 mm |
| Weight | 432 g | 800 g | −368 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X1-6 better than M300 Mini?
- Weight432 g vs 800 g+85%
- Satellite systems supported6 vs 5+20%
- Operating temperature (max)85 °C vs 75 °C+13%
Why is M300 Mini better than X1-6?
M300 Mini has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 6 | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5b, B1, B2 | — |
| Tracking channels | — | 496 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 8 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 15 mm |
| Static accuracy (horizontal) | — | 2.5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), UHF radio, Cellular modem, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 85 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 432 g | 800 g |
| Width | 114 mm | 142 mm |
| Height | 116 mm | 52 mm |
| Depth | 39 mm | 191 mm |
| Housing material | aluminium | Rugged aluminum alloy |
