- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs M100X
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs ComNav M100X
What CGI-230 does better (0) and where M100X wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
CGI-230M100X
| CGI-230 | M100X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 350 mm | 151 mm | +199 mm |
| Width | 105 mm | 27 mm | +78 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 103 mm | +51 mm |
| Weight | 400 g | 300 g | +100 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CGI-230 better than M100X?
CGI-230 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is M100X better than CGI-230?
- Weight400 g vs 300 g+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 5 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, E1, E5b, B1, B2, B3, L-band |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Cellular modem (4G / LTE) | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | — | 1 m |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -40 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 400 g | 300 g |
| Width | 105 mm | 27 mm |
| Height | 350 mm | 151 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 103 mm |
| Housing material | — | Aluminum Alloy |
