- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs Archer 4
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Juniper Archer 4
What CGI-230 does better (0) and where Archer 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
CGI-230Archer 4
| CGI-230 | Archer 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 350 mm | 102 mm | +248 mm |
| Width | 105 mm | 42 mm | +63 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 34 mm | +120 mm |
| Weight | 400 g | 42 g | +358 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CGI-230 better than Archer 4?
CGI-230 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Archer 4 better than CGI-230?
- Weight400 g vs 42 g9.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Tracking channels | — | 184 |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet) |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | No |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | — |
| Weight | 400 g | 42 g |
| Width | 105 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 350 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 34 mm |
| Housing material | — | N/A |
