- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs Marvel
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs INTEC Marvel
What CGI-230 does better (1) and where Marvel wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is CGI-230 better than Marvel?
- Weight400 g vs 660 g+65%
Why is Marvel better than CGI-230?
Marvel has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 4 |
| Tracking channels | — | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 5 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), SBAS |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 20 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | — |
| Weight | 400 g | 660 g |
| Width | 105 mm | — |
| Height | 350 mm | — |
| Depth | 154 mm | — |
| Housing material | — | ABS |
