- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs Arrow 100+
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Eos Arrow 100+
What CGI-230 does better (1) and where Arrow 100+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
9.5Durability9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
CGI-230Arrow 100+
| CGI-230 | Arrow 100+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 350 mm | 125 mm | +225 mm |
| Width | 105 mm | 42 mm | +63 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 84 mm | +70 mm |
| Weight | 400 g | 372 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CGI-230 better than Arrow 100+?
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 70 °C+7%
Why is Arrow 100+ better than CGI-230?
- Weight400 g vs 372 g+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Tracking channels | — | 158 |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | — | L-band / PPP |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 18 h |
| Power source | — | Removable rechargeable pack |
| External power input | — | 12VDC Power Supply |
| Build & durability | ||
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 70 °C |
| Weight | 400 g | 372 g |
| Width | 105 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 350 mm | 125 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 84 mm |
| Housing material | — | Xenoy |
