- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs Arrow Gold+
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Eos Arrow Gold+
What CGI-230 does better (0) and where Arrow Gold+ wins (2) — every spec side by side.
9.5Durability9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
CGI-230Arrow Gold+
| CGI-230 | Arrow Gold+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 350 mm | 125 mm | +225 mm |
| Width | 105 mm | 42 mm | +63 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 84 mm | +70 mm |
| Weight | 400 g | 372 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CGI-230 better than Arrow Gold+?
CGI-230 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Arrow Gold+ better than CGI-230?
- Weight400 g vs 372 g+8%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 85 °C+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L5, E6, B3 |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 11 h |
| Power source | — | Removable rechargeable pack |
| External power input | — | 12VDC Power Supply |
| Build & durability | ||
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | — |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 85 °C |
| Weight | 400 g | 372 g |
| Width | 105 mm | 42 mm |
| Height | 350 mm | 125 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 84 mm |
| Housing material | — | Xenoy |
