LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. CGI-230 vs Skadi 300

CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Eos Skadi 300

What CGI-230 does better (3) and where Skadi 300 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

CHCNAV CGI-230
CHCNAV · 2024CGI-230
3 advantages
vs
Eos Skadi 300
Eos · 2024Skadi 300
4.4Score
0 advantages
Higher score
9.5Durability2.2

Why is CGI-230 better than Skadi 300?

  1. Weight400 g vs 935 g2.3×
  2. Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -15 °C+-62%
  3. Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 50 °C+50%

Why is Skadi 300 better than CGI-230?

Skadi 300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systems—GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported—6
Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2)—Yes
Frequency bands—L1, L2, L5, E5a, E5b, B1, B2
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)—Yes
RTK positioning—Yes
Tilt compensation (IMU)YesYes
Dual-antenna headingYes—
Correction sources—L-band / PPP, SBAS
L-band / PPP corrections—Yes
Connectivity & safety
Bluetooth—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Battery & power
Hot-swappable batteries—Yes
Build & durability
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C-15 °C
Operating temperature (max)75 °C50 °C
Weight400 g935 g
Width105 mm—
Height350 mm—
Depth154 mm—
Housing material—Xenoy® with TPU overmold
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare