- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs Skadi Gold
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Eos Skadi Gold
What CGI-230 does better (3) and where Skadi Gold wins (0) — every spec side by side.
9.5Durability2.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
CGI-230Skadi Gold
| CGI-230 | Skadi Gold | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 350 mm | 142 mm | +208 mm |
| Width | 105 mm | 60 mm | +45 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 95 mm | +59 mm |
| Weight | 400 g | 935 g | −535 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CGI-230 better than Skadi Gold?
- Weight400 g vs 935 g2.3×
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -15 °C+-62%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 50 °C+50%
Why is Skadi Gold better than CGI-230?
Skadi Gold has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 6 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | — | Yes |
| Frequency bands | — | L1, L2, L5, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 |
| Tracking channels | — | 800 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | — | Yes |
| RTK accuracy (horizontal) | — | 10 mm |
| RTK accuracy (vertical) | — | 20 mm |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | — | 90° |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | — |
| Correction sources | — | NTRIP (internet), L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 9 h |
| Hot-swappable batteries | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -15 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 50 °C |
| Weight | 400 g | 935 g |
| Width | 105 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 350 mm | 142 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | 95 mm |
| Housing material | — | Xenoy® with TPU overmold |
