- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- CGI-230 vs AsteRx SB3 Pro+
CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Septentrio AsteRx SB3 Pro+
What CGI-230 does better (3) and where AsteRx SB3 Pro+ wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Durability8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
CGI-230AsteRx SB3 Pro+
| CGI-230 | AsteRx SB3 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 350 mm | 118 mm | +232 mm |
| Width | 105 mm | 102 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 400 g | 497 g | −97 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CGI-230 better than AsteRx SB3 Pro+?
- Weight400 g vs 497 g+24%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -30 °C+-25%
- Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 65 °C+15%
Why is AsteRx SB3 Pro+ better than CGI-230?
AsteRx SB3 Pro+ has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) |
| Satellite systems supported | — | 6 |
| Tracking channels | — | 544 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | — |
| Dual-antenna heading | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | — | L-band / PPP, SBAS |
| L-band / PPP corrections | — | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| External power input | — | 5-36 VDC |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| MIL-STD-810 | — | Yes |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -30 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 75 °C | 65 °C |
| Weight | 400 g | 497 g |
| Width | 105 mm | 102 mm |
| Height | 350 mm | 118 mm |
| Depth | 154 mm | — |
| Housing material | — | Ruggedized enclosure IP68 |
