LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 869Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. CGI-230 vs S599

CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Stonex S599

What CGI-230 does better (2) and where S599 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

CHCNAV CGI-230
CHCNAV · 2024CGI-230
2 advantages
vs
Stonex S599
Stonex · 2025S599
6.9Score
1 advantage
Higher score
9.5Durability8.5

Why is CGI-230 better than S599?

  1. Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -30 °C+-25%
  2. Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 60 °C+25%

Why is S599 better than CGI-230?

  1. Weight400 g vs 385 g+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systems—GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported—6
Tracking channels—1,408
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)—Yes
RTK positioning—Yes
RTK accuracy (horizontal)—8 mm
Static accuracy (horizontal)—2.5 mm
Tilt compensation (IMU)YesYes
Dual-antenna headingYes—
Correction sources—L-band / PPP, SBAS
Built-in UHF radio—No
L-band / PPP corrections—Yes
Maps & navigation
Internal storage—8 GB
Connectivity & safety
Bluetooth—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Camera—Yes
Battery & power
Battery life—12 h
Battery capacity—6,000 mAh
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C-30 °C
Operating temperature (max)75 °C60 °C
Weight400 g385 g
Width105 mm98 mm
Height350 mm46 mm
Depth154 mm98 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare