LIVE301 modelsBrands 35Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026 RankingsAdvertise
precisionagricultu.re
  1. precisionagricultu.re
  2. Compare
  3. CGI-230 vs S999

CHCNAV CGI-230 vs Stonex S999

What CGI-230 does better (2) and where S999 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

CHCNAV CGI-230
CHCNAV · 2024CGI-230
2 advantages
vs
Stonex S999
Stonex · 2024S999
8.5Score
0 advantages
Higher score
9.5Durability7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

CGI-230S999
105 × 350154139 × 74139
CGI-230S999Difference
Height350 mm74 mm+276 mm
Width105 mm139 mm−34 mm
Depth154 mm139 mm+15 mm
Weight400 g1,065 g−665 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CGI-230 better than S999?

  1. Weight400 g vs 1,065 g2.7×
  2. Operating temperature (max)75 °C vs 65 °C+15%

Why is S999 better than CGI-230?

S999 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Satellite positioning
Satellite systems—GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS)
Satellite systems supported—6
Tracking channels—1,408
SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS)—Yes
Tilt compensation (IMU)YesYes
Max. tilt angle—60°
Dual-antenna headingYes—
Correction sources—NTRIP (internet), Cellular modem, L-band / PPP, SBAS
Built-in UHF radio—No
L-band / PPP corrections—Yes
Maps & navigation
Internal storage—31 GB
Connectivity & safety
Bluetooth—Yes
Cellular modem (4G / LTE)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Camera—Yes
Battery & power
Battery life—10 h
Battery capacity—13,600 mAh
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Operating temperature (min)-40 °C-40 °C
Operating temperature (max)75 °C65 °C
Weight400 g1,065 g
Width105 mm139 mm
Height350 mm74 mm
Depth154 mm139 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare