- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i76 vs Marvel Lite
CHCNAV i76 vs INTEC Marvel Lite
What i76 does better (3) and where Marvel Lite wins (2) — every spec side by side.
5.3Positioning3.1
9.3Durability8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
i76Marvel Lite
| i76 | Marvel Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 56 mm | 89 mm | −33 mm |
| Width | 106 mm | 120 mm | −14 mm |
| Weight | 450 g | 660 g | −210 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is i76 better than Marvel Lite?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Weight450 g vs 660 g+47%
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 4+25%
Why is Marvel Lite better than i76?
- Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 75 °C+15%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -45 °C+-11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC (IRNSS) | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 4 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L5, E6, B2 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | — | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Max. tilt angle | 60° | — |
| Correction sources | UHF radio | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | Yes | Yes |
| Maps & navigation | ||
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Camera | Yes | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | — | 20 h |
| External power input | Type-C 5 V / 2 A | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -45 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 450 g | 660 g |
| Width | 106 mm | 120 mm |
| Height | 56 mm | 89 mm |
| Depth | — | 89 mm |
| Housing material | — | ABS |
