- precisionagricultu.re
- Compare
- i83 vs Marvel Lite
CHCNAV i83 vs INTEC Marvel Lite
What i83 does better (1) and where Marvel Lite wins (4) — every spec side by side.
4.9Positioning3.1
8.6Battery9.0
4.0Durability8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
i83Marvel Lite
| i83 | Marvel Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 78 mm | 89 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 152 mm | 120 mm | +32 mm |
| Depth | 152 mm | 89 mm | +63 mm |
| Weight | 1,150 g | 660 g | +490 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is i83 better than Marvel Lite?
- Satellite systems supported5 vs 4+25%
Why is Marvel Lite better than i83?
- Weight1,150 g vs 660 g+74%
- Battery life18 h vs 20 h+11%
- Operating temperature (max)65 °C vs 75 °C+15%
- Operating temperature (min)-40 °C vs -45 °C+-11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Satellite positioning | ||
| Satellite systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Satellite systems supported | 5 | 4 |
| Multi-band GNSS (L1 + L5/L2) | Yes | — |
| Frequency bands | L1, L2, L5, E1, E5a, E5b, E6, B1, B2, B3 | — |
| Tracking channels | 1,408 | 1,408 |
| SBAS (WAAS / EGNOS) | Yes | Yes |
| RTK positioning | Yes | — |
| Tilt compensation (IMU) | Yes | Yes |
| Correction sources | NTRIP (internet), SBAS | UHF radio, LoRa radio, SBAS |
| Built-in UHF radio | — | Yes |
| Raw data logging (RINEX) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & safety | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 20 h |
| Battery capacity | 9,600 mAh | — |
| Power source | Removable rechargeable pack | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Drop resistance | 2 m | — |
| Operating temperature (min) | -40 °C | -45 °C |
| Operating temperature (max) | 65 °C | 75 °C |
| Weight | 1,150 g | 660 g |
| Width | 152 mm | 120 mm |
| Height | 78 mm | 89 mm |
| Depth | 152 mm | 89 mm |
| Housing material | — | ABS |
